Professional Membership
Bankruptcy | Case Law | Rule 9014
BANKR. RULE 9014
In re Khachikyan, 335 B.R. 121 (9th Cir. BAP 2005)
Rule 9014(d), included in a 2002 amendment to the rule, is intended to require a trial when
there is a genuine factual dispute. Furthermore, “[a]s a strategic matter, where one wants
discovery in a contested matter, it is generally too late to wait to the day of the hearing on the
merits to request to conduct discovery in the future.”
In re Nunez, 196 B.R. 150 (9th Cir. B.A.P. 1996)
Ambiguous local rules do not require lien creditor to notice hearing on objection to
debtor’s motion to avoid abstract of judgment